Namesys is a very useful submodule. Given a ValueStore and a Datastore it can
resolve and publish /ipns/ paths.
This functionality does not need to be sequestered inside go-ipfs as it can
and should be used without IPFS, for example, for implementing lightweight
IPNS publishing services or for resolving /ipns/ paths.
"keystore" extraction was necessary, as there is a dependency to it in
namesys. Keystore is also a useful module by itself within the stack.
Fixes#6537
This commit fixes the errors resulting from passing a nil pointer to the
core.NewNode function in TestExternalUnmmount and setupIpnsTest.
In the previous nil's place a &core.BuildCfg{} is now passed.
Both changes follow the same pattern:
```diff
- node, err = core.NewNode(context.Background(), nil)
+ node, err = core.NewNode(context.Background(), &core.BuildCfg{})
```
On branch go-test-fix
Changes to be committed:
modified: fuse/ipns/ipns_test.go
modified: fuse/node/mount_test.go
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Chris Buesser <christopher.buesser@gmail.com>
Most of these are probably harmless but a few looked like they might actually be
bugs. Most of them are just faulty tests.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Steven Allen <steven@stebalien.com>
Switch _back_ to the 0.4.18 style of peer IDs while we figure things out. See
https://github.com/libp2p/specs/issues/138.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Steven Allen <steven@stebalien.com>
1. Update to use the new `Open` function.
2. Use `Flush()` instead of `Sync()` as sync was removed as useless (this should
have been calling `Flush()` all along).
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Steven Allen <steven@stebalien.com>
Loading this at the last minute means we need a bunch of special cases
in *every* command that needs routing, namesys, or even the public key.
If we ever have a case where we don't want to do this, we can add an option to
the (eventual) IPFS constructor. Handling this up-front is going to be
significantly less error prone.
Motivation: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/pull/5825/files#diff-fe35ea64d478c4f3fb767a3f618e5d01R863
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Steven Allen <steven@stebalien.com>
Turns out that `pool.Put(buf)` had to *allocate* because we needed to turn
`[]byte` into `interface{}`. Apparently, we've never done this correctly we just
never noticed because we never really used buffer pools extensively.
However, since migrating yamux to a buffer-pool backed buffer, this started
showing up in allocation profiles.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Steven Allen <steven@stebalien.com>