This commit adds a new set of sharness tests for pinning, and addresses
bugs that were pointed out by said tests.
test/sharness: added more pinning tests
Pinning is currently broken. See issue #1051. This commit introduces
a few more pinning tests. These are by no means exhaustive, but
definitely surface the present problems going on. I believe these
tests are correct, but not sure. Pushing them as failing so that
pinning is fixed in this PR.
make pinning and merkledag.Get take contexts
improve 'add' commands usage of pinning
FIXUP: fix 'pin lists look good'
ipfs-pin-stat simple script to help check pinning
This is a simple shell script to help check pinning.
We ought to strive towards making adding commands this easy.
The http api is great and powerful, but our setup right now
gets in the way. Perhaps we can clean up that area.
updated t0081-repo-pinning
- fixed a couple bugs with the tests
- made it a bit clearer (still a lot going on)
- the remaining tests are correct and highlight a problem with
pinning. Namely, that recursive pinning is buggy. At least:
towards the end of the test, $HASH_DIR4 and $HASH_FILE4 should
be pinned indirectly, but they're not. And thus get gc-ed out.
There may be other problems too.
cc @whyrusleeping
fix grep params for context deadline check
fix bugs in pin and pin tests
check for block local before checking recursive pin
- updated go-ctxgroup and goprocess
ctxgroup: AddChildGroup was changed to AddChild. Used in two files:
- p2p/net/mock/mock_net.go
- routing/dht/dht.go
- updated context from hg repo to git
prev. commit in hg was ad01a6fcc8a19d3a4478c836895ffe883bd2ceab. (context: make parentCancelCtx iterative)
represents commit 84f8955a887232b6308d79c68b8db44f64df455c in git repo
- updated context to master (b6fdb7d8a4ccefede406f8fe0f017fb58265054c)
Aaron Jacobs (2):
net/context: Don't accept a context in the DoSomethingSlow example.
context: Be clear that users must cancel the result of WithCancel.
Andrew Gerrand (1):
go.net: use golang.org/x/... import paths
Bryan C. Mills (1):
net/context: Don't leak goroutines in Done example.
Damien Neil (1):
context: fix removal of cancelled timer contexts from parent
David Symonds (2):
context: Fix WithValue example code.
net: add import comments.
Sameer Ajmani (1):
context: fix TestAllocs to account for ints in interfaces
refactor test peer creation to be deterministic and reliable
a bit of cleanup trying to figure out TestGetFailure
add test to verify deterministic peer creation
switch put RPC over to use getClosestPeers
rm 0xDEADC0DE
fix queries not searching peer if its not actually closer
@whyrusleeping @jbenet this is a WIP with the DHT.
wip
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Brian Tiger Chow <brian@perfmode.com>
Conflicts:
epictest/addcat_test.go
exchange/bitswap/testnet/peernet.go
exchange/bitswap/testutils.go
routing/mock/centralized_server.go
routing/mock/centralized_test.go
routing/mock/interface.go
fix(routing/mock) fill in function definition
this is a major refactor of the entire codebase
it changes the monolithic peer.Peer into using
a peer.ID and a peer.Peerstore.
Other changes:
- removed handshake3.
- testutil vastly simplified peer
- secio bugfix + debugging logs
- testutil: RandKeyPair
- backpressure bugfix: w.o.w.
- peer: added hex enc/dec
- peer: added a PeerInfo struct
PeerInfo is a small struct used to pass around a peer with
a set of addresses and keys. This is not meant to be a
complete view of the system, but rather to model updates to
the peerstore. It is used by things like the routing system.
- updated peer/queue + peerset
- latency metrics
- testutil: use crand for PeerID gen
RandPeerID generates random "valid" peer IDs. it does not
NEED to generate keys because it is as if we lost the key
right away. fine to read some randomness and hash it. to
generate proper keys and an ID, use:
sk, pk, _ := testutil.RandKeyPair()
id, _ := peer.IDFromPublicKey(pk)
Also added RandPeerIDFatal helper
- removed old spipe
- updated seccat
- core: cleanup initIdentity
- removed old getFromPeerList
the u.Hash error can be safely ignored (panic) because multihash
only fails from the selection of hash function. If the fn + length
are valid, it won't error.
cc @whyrusleeping
