fix: improve ipfs name put for IPNS record republishing

`name put` rejected republishing the exact same record because the
sequence check used `>=` which blocked the common use case of fetching
a third-party record and putting it back to refresh DHT availability.

allow putting identical records (same bytes) while still rejecting
different records with the same or lower sequence number. also add
a success message on put (suppressible with `--quiet`), and clarify
the error message to say "IPNS record" and reference `ipfs name put --force`.

Closes #11197

core/commands/name/name.go

@@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ const (
 	forceOptionName       = "force"
 	putAllowOfflineOption = "allow-offline"
 	allowDelegatedOption  = "allow-delegated"
+	putQuietOptionName    = "quiet"
 	maxIPNSRecordSize     = 10 << 10 // 10 KiB per IPNS spec
 )
 
@@ -374,6 +375,7 @@ By default, the command validates that:
   - The record size is within 10 KiB limit
   - The signature matches the provided IPNS name
   - The record's sequence number is higher than any existing record
+    (identical records are allowed for republishing)
 
 The --force flag skips this command's validation and passes the record
 directly to the routing system. Note that --force only affects this command;
@@ -421,6 +423,7 @@ Force store a record to test routing validation:
 		cmds.BoolOption(forceOptionName, "f", "Skip validation (signature, sequence, size)."),
 		cmds.BoolOption(putAllowOfflineOption, "Store locally without broadcasting to the network."),
 		cmds.BoolOption(allowDelegatedOption, "Publish via HTTP delegated publishers only (no DHT)."),
+		cmds.BoolOption(putQuietOptionName, "q", "Write no output."),
 	},
 	Run: func(req *cmds.Request, res cmds.ResponseEmitter, env cmds.Environment) error {
 		nd, err := cmdenv.GetNode(env)
@@ -506,14 +509,15 @@ Force store a record to test routing validation:
 			// Check for sequence conflicts with existing record
 			existingData, err := api.Routing().Get(req.Context, nameArg)
 			if err == nil {
-				// We have an existing record, check sequence
-				existingRec, parseErr := ipns.UnmarshalRecord(existingData)
-				if parseErr == nil {
-					existingSeq, seqErr := existingRec.Sequence()
-					newSeq, newSeqErr := rec.Sequence()
-					if seqErr == nil && newSeqErr == nil {
-						if existingSeq >= newSeq {
-							return fmt.Errorf("existing record has sequence %d >= new record sequence %d, use --force to overwrite", existingSeq, newSeq)
+				// Allow republishing the exact same record (common use case:
+				// get a third-party record and put it back to refresh DHT)
+				if !bytes.Equal(existingData, data) {
+					existingRec, parseErr := ipns.UnmarshalRecord(existingData)
+					if parseErr == nil {
+						existingSeq, seqErr := existingRec.Sequence()
+						newSeq, newSeqErr := rec.Sequence()
+						if seqErr == nil && newSeqErr == nil && existingSeq >= newSeq {
+							return fmt.Errorf("existing IPNS record has sequence %d >= new record sequence %d, use 'ipfs name put --force' to skip this check", existingSeq, newSeq)
 						}
 					}
 				}
@@ -536,6 +540,28 @@ Force store a record to test routing validation:
 			return err
 		}
 
-		return nil
+		// Extract value from the record for the response
+		value := ""
+		if rec, err := ipns.UnmarshalRecord(data); err == nil {
+			if v, err := rec.Value(); err == nil {
+				value = v.String()
+			}
+		}
+
+		return cmds.EmitOnce(res, &IpnsEntry{
+			Name:  name.String(),
+			Value: value,
+		})
 	},
+	Encoders: cmds.EncoderMap{
+		cmds.Text: cmds.MakeTypedEncoder(func(req *cmds.Request, w io.Writer, ie *IpnsEntry) error {
+			quiet, _ := req.Options[putQuietOptionName].(bool)
+			if quiet {
+				return nil
+			}
+			_, err := fmt.Fprintln(w, cmdenv.EscNonPrint(ie.Name))
+			return err
+		}),
+	},
+	Type: IpnsEntry{},
 }

test/cli/name_test.go

@@ -587,10 +587,9 @@ func TestNameGetPut(t *testing.T) {
 		res := node.RunIPFS("name", "put", ipnsName.String(), recordFile)
 		require.NoError(t, res.Err)
 
-		// now try to put the same record again (should fail - same sequence)
+		// put the same record again (identical record republishing is allowed)
 		res = node.RunIPFS("name", "put", ipnsName.String(), recordFile)
-		require.Error(t, res.Err)
-		require.Contains(t, res.Stderr.String(), "existing record has sequence")
+		require.NoError(t, res.Err)
 
 		// put the record with --force (should succeed)
 		res = node.RunIPFS("name", "put", "--force", ipnsName.String(), recordFile)
@@ -884,6 +883,87 @@ func TestNameGetPut(t *testing.T) {
 
 		res = node.RunIPFS("name", "put", ipnsName.String(), recordFile)
 		require.Error(t, res.Err)
-		require.Contains(t, res.Stderr.String(), "existing record has sequence 200 >= new record sequence 100")
+		require.Contains(t, res.Stderr.String(), "existing IPNS record has sequence 200 >= new record sequence 100")
+	})
+
+	t.Run("name put allows identical record republishing", func(t *testing.T) {
+		t.Parallel()
+		h := harness.NewT(t)
+		publishPath := "/ipfs/" + fixtureCid
+
+		ipnsName, record := makeExternalRecord(t, h, publishPath, "--sequence=100")
+
+		node := makeDaemon(t)
+		defer node.StopDaemon()
+
+		// put the record
+		res := node.PipeToIPFS(bytes.NewReader(record), "name", "put", ipnsName.String())
+		require.NoError(t, res.Err)
+
+		// put the exact same record again (same bytes, same sequence)
+		// this should succeed: republishing an identical record is a valid use case
+		res = node.PipeToIPFS(bytes.NewReader(record), "name", "put", ipnsName.String())
+		require.NoError(t, res.Err)
+		require.Contains(t, res.Stdout.String(), ipnsName.String())
+	})
+
+	t.Run("name put rejects different record with same sequence", func(t *testing.T) {
+		t.Parallel()
+		h := harness.NewT(t)
+
+		// create two different records signed by the same key with the same
+		// sequence number by using two ephemeral nodes that share a key
+		ephNode1 := h.NewNode().Init("--profile=test")
+		r, err := os.Open(fixturePath)
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+		err = ephNode1.IPFSDagImport(r, fixtureCid)
+		r.Close()
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+		ephNode1.StartDaemon()
+
+		res := ephNode1.IPFS("key", "gen", "--type=ed25519", "shared-key")
+		keyID := strings.TrimSpace(res.Stdout.String())
+		ipnsName, err := ipns.NameFromString(keyID)
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+
+		// publish record A (sequence=100, value=fixtureCid)
+		ephNode1.IPFS("name", "publish", "--key=shared-key", "--lifetime=5m", "--sequence=100", "/ipfs/"+fixtureCid)
+		res = ephNode1.IPFS("name", "get", ipnsName.String())
+		recordA := res.Stdout.Bytes()
+
+		// export key and import into second ephemeral node
+		keyFile := filepath.Join(ephNode1.Dir, "shared-key.key")
+		ephNode1.IPFS("key", "export", "--output="+keyFile, "shared-key")
+		ephNode1.StopDaemon()
+
+		ephNode2 := h.NewNode().Init("--profile=test")
+		ephNode2.StartDaemon()
+		ephNode2.IPFS("key", "import", "shared-key", keyFile)
+
+		// publish record B (sequence=100, different value)
+		ephNode2.IPFS("name", "publish", "--key=shared-key", "--lifetime=5m", "--sequence=100", "/ipfs/bafkqaaa")
+		res = ephNode2.IPFS("name", "get", ipnsName.String())
+		recordB := res.Stdout.Bytes()
+		ephNode2.StopDaemon()
+
+		// verify records have same sequence but different bytes
+		require.NotEqual(t, recordA, recordB, "records should have different bytes")
+
+		// start test node and try the put scenario
+		node := makeDaemon(t)
+		defer node.StopDaemon()
+
+		// put record A
+		res = node.PipeToIPFS(bytes.NewReader(recordA), "name", "put", ipnsName.String())
+		require.NoError(t, res.Err)
+
+		// try to put record B (different bytes, same sequence=100)
+		recordFile := filepath.Join(node.Dir, "recordB.bin")
+		err = os.WriteFile(recordFile, recordB, 0644)
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+
+		res = node.RunIPFS("name", "put", ipnsName.String(), recordFile)
+		require.Error(t, res.Err)
+		require.Contains(t, res.Stderr.String(), "existing IPNS record has sequence 100 >= new record sequence 100")
 	})
 }