docs: link sweep blogpost in Provide.DHT.SweepEnabled
Some checks failed
CodeQL / codeql (push) Has been cancelled
Docker Check / lint (push) Has been cancelled
Docker Check / build (push) Has been cancelled
Gateway Conformance / gateway-conformance (push) Has been cancelled
Gateway Conformance / gateway-conformance-libp2p-experiment (push) Has been cancelled
Go Build / go-build (push) Has been cancelled
Go Check / go-check (push) Has been cancelled
Go Lint / go-lint (push) Has been cancelled
Go Test / go-test (push) Has been cancelled
Interop / interop-prep (push) Has been cancelled
Sharness / sharness-test (push) Has been cancelled
Spell Check / spellcheck (push) Has been cancelled
Interop / helia-interop (push) Has been cancelled
Interop / ipfs-webui (push) Has been cancelled

add link to Shipyard's "Provide Sweep: Solving the DHT Provide
Bottleneck" blogpost and remove stale TODO placeholder
This commit is contained in:
Marcin Rataj 2025-11-28 23:19:03 +01:00
parent af2e7e1953
commit c1e1cfebbb

View File

@ -1945,8 +1945,6 @@ map CIDs to your peer ID, enabling content discovery across the network.
While designed to support multiple routing systems in the future, the current
default configuration only supports [providing to the Amino DHT](#providedht).
<!-- TODO: See the [Reprovide Sweep blog post](https://github.com/ipshipyard/ipshipyard.com/pull/8) for detailed performance comparisons. -->
### `Provide.Enabled`
Controls whether Kubo provide and reprovide systems are enabled.
@ -2190,6 +2188,8 @@ to `false`.
>
> Sweep mode achieves similar effectiveness to the Accelerated DHT client but with steady resource consumption.
For background on the sweep provider design and motivations, see Shipyard's blogpost [Provide Sweep: Solving the DHT Provide Bottleneck](https://ipshipyard.com/blog/2025-dht-provide-sweep/).
You can compare the effectiveness of sweep mode vs legacy mode by monitoring the appropriate metrics (see [Monitoring Provide Operations](#monitoring-provide-operations) above).
> [!NOTE]